Fund the research

At nine, girls start to disappear from the playground.

The girls you want on your team are standing at the edge of the pitch.

Every line is one child moving through recess. Blue fills the middle. Red traces the edges. We are architects and urban designers, and for years we have mapped how children move in schoolyards and parks. The pattern is the same everywhere: the space is designed for one game, and girls are designed out.

Only 8% of girls aged 13–15 meet activity guidelines Football pitches take 28–35% of school grounds 2–6% is left for everything else Girls spend over 70% of recess on the edges In the park, boys claim 8.5% of usable space. Girls get 1% Even dogs get 2% Only 8% of girls aged 13–15 meet activity guidelines Football pitches take 28–35% of school grounds 2–6% is left for everything else Girls spend over 70% of recess on the edges In the park, boys claim 8.5% of usable space. Girls get 1% Even dogs get 2%

01What is footballcentrism?

One game takes the centre. Everyone else gets the edge.

Footballcentrism is a spatial bias. Schoolyards and parks are planned around a large, central, best-maintained football pitch. Competitive, team-based, traditionally male-coded play gets the most visible space. Everything else — sitting, talking, dancing, climbing, handstands — is squeezed into what is left over.

The pitch becomes territory. Confident boys hold it. Girls, and boys who don't play football, learn early where they don't belong — and carry that lesson into streets, squares and adult life.

How a typical schoolyard is divided

Football pitch
Paths, entrances, leftover hard surface
28–35%Football pitch
2–6%Space left for any other activity

Girls do not question space. They adjust. They adapt.

Adaptation is not strength. It is erasure. — Architektoniczki, 2025

02What we saw

The numbers from the field.

#39Schoolyards
2–6%

of school grounds are left for anything other than the pitch.

#50Schoolyards
~100%

of football-pitch use is by boys. It is the most visible space in the school.

#50Schoolyards
70%+

of girls' observed time is spent on the periphery, often in shaded or hidden corners.

#48Schoolyards
80%

Girls' routes are about 80% as long as boys'. Their movement is limited across the whole yard.

#49Schoolyards
60%

of girls' activities are seated or stationary. Boys' play is mostly active.

#47Park
8.5% vs 1%

Boys claim 8.5% of the park's usable space. Girls get 1%, mostly benches. Dogs get 2%.

#54Park
2 girls

joined the boys' football in one month of observation — on just two occasions.

#63Park
After dark

the park becomes a male domain. Girls are absent — held back by safety concerns, not by choice.

Findings from Architektoniczki field research. Full data and sources in the project guide.

03Mapped paths

Four schoolyards. Same story.

#1

Schoolyard 01

One big court block takes the whole open yard. Every route starts at the same door.

Schoolyard 01: girls' paths
Girls
Schoolyard 01: boys' paths
Boys
Schoolyard 01: all paths
Together
#2

Schoolyard 02

Boys spread across the open yard. Girls keep to a narrow strip along one side.

Schoolyard 02: girls' paths
Girls
Schoolyard 02: boys' paths
Boys
Schoolyard 02: all paths
Together
#3

Schoolyard 03

Blue fills the pitch. Red hugs the edge of the building.

Schoolyard 03: girls' paths
Girls
Schoolyard 03: boys' paths
Boys
Schoolyard 03: all paths
Together
#4

Schoolyard 04

Blue circles the pitch. Red runs the corridor beside it, under the trees.

Schoolyard 04: girls' paths
Girls
Schoolyard 04: boys' paths
Boys
Schoolyard 04: all paths
Together

04Why we need you now

We know how to bring girls back. We don't yet know how to make them move.

When a park swaps the pitch-and-playground layout for hammocks, swings and seating, girls come back. The ratio flips. But they still sit. The design changed where girls are — not whether they are active.

That is the gap our next phase will close: which physical changes to a schoolyard actually get girls running, climbing and playing — and keep them active past the age when they usually stop.

Traditional park — football pitch & playground

5 boys : 2 girls

Redesigned park — hammocks, swings, seating

1 boy : 3 girls

Make
Her
Move

Grzesikowska & Jaskulska · Coming soon

05 The book

Read it first.

Years of fieldwork, maps and children's own voices in one book: how schoolyards and parks decide who gets to move, and what architects, schools and cities can do about it.

One email when the book is out. Nothing else.

06Partner with us

Put your name on the change.

Lead partner

Fund the international phase

  • Named as lead partner on the research and the book
  • A pilot schoolyard redesign carries your name
  • Co-branded launch event
  • First access to findings
Talk to us
Research partner

Fund a country

  • Support mapping in one country
  • Logo on research outputs and the book
  • A talk for your team or community
Talk to us
Supporter

Fund a schoolyard

  • Support the study of one schoolyard
  • Thanks in the book
  • Project updates
Talk to us
Individuals

Give what you can

  • Every contribution goes to fieldwork
  • Your name in the book's thank-you list
Support

→For football clubs

Your next generation of players is already in the schoolyard. Most of them are girls you never see.

This isn't research against football. It's research for more girls playing — including football. In a month of observation, only two girls joined a game. Help us find out what would change that.

07Watch

Footballcentrism in three parts.

Part I

What is football-centrism?

Part II

Let's talk data

Part III

Hack the space

08Who we are

Architects who watched where children go.

Researcher

Honorata Grzesikowska

Urban designer and spatial equity specialist. Long-standing research into gender-equitable public space.

Researcher

Ewelina Jaskulska

Architect. Co-author of the term footballcentrism (Jaskulska & Grzesikowska, 2022).

In collaboration with

Fundacja Architektoniczki

Previous phase co-funded by the Erasmus+ programme of the European Union.

Fund the research